ccna sample question paper

ccna sample question paper

Parameters: Version:1 flags:0000 cksum:7931 ttl:255 reserved:0 length:132 LSP Checksum Value In the cfg-ip-expl-path mode, you can also use the list keyword to view all the next-addresses that have been entered . Use index x next-address to specify the index number of each next- hop IP that has been entered . 55.55.55.55 [110/31] via 10.1.23.3, 00:03:44, Ethernet0/1 3.3.3.3/32 Remote binding: tsr: 2.2.2.2:0, tag: 203 Local binding: tag: imp-null Router isis No frame-relay inverse-arp *Aug 18 11:31:44.598: Interface eth0 0/0 103 *Aug 18 11:31:44.598: Checksum: 0x6FEB Length: 132 Define source Now we activate LDP for all interfaces . Then on R3 : 906 Router(config)#mpls traffic-eng reoptimize timers frequency ? *Aug 18 09:06:02.699: IS Hops:1 Network 10.1.24.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 MTU implicit check DBD IGP Area[1] ID:: ospf area 0 System Information:: The router on Lan establishes adjacency with all other routers. In OSPF , the router on the LAN only establishes adjacency with the DR . R1.00-00 R1(config)#router isis TE metric: 1 The configuration of RouterA is as follows: MPLS label header. At the same time, the header of the Layer 2 data link layer will be instructed accordingly. For example, the Ethernet data frame, the TYPE field of the MAC layer indicates whether the upper layer data is an mpls label frame (if it is an IPv4 packet, the value is 0x0800 , if it is a label packet) Then it is 8847 -unicast or 8848- multicast) Is-type level-1 metric-style wide Et0/1 Interface fa1/0 OutLabel : Ethernet0/0, 201 RSVP Signalling Info: All routers in the LAN advertise their own connectivity to the pseudonodes in their LSPs (the adjacency relationship between themselves and the pseudonodes) 33000 This will result in the OL bit of the LSP generated by R2 , and the result seen on R1 is this: In this way, my network resources will be more rationally utilized. When R1 goes to 1.0/24 and 2.0/24 ,ccna sample question paper, traffic will be sent to different tunnels on R1 . At this moment R1 is the head end of my tunnel , and R5 is the end. The tunnel can set bandwidth requirements so that my tunnel can make more scientific and reasonable routing in the network, not just using OSPF metric for routing. The calculation of the tunnel path is done on the R1, which is the tunnel first-end router. In order to enable the head-end router to calculate the tunnel path more reasonably (not only using metric , but also participating in the path with elements such as available bandwidth and link attributes. Computation), we need to extend the link state routing protocol running in the network, in order to flood the information required for more path calculations, extended OSPF and IS-IS can accomplish this task.