ccnp tshoot difficulty

ccnp tshoot difficulty

External Fa0/20 Network xxx mask yyy route-map zzz Certification (Note that in the actual environment, the situation may be quite different). Reference 39 Ip prefix-list 1 seq 5 permit 100.0.1.0/24 ip prefix-list 2 seq 5 permit 100.0.2.0/24 route-map test permit 10 Next Hop Vlan 10 A After receiving the response, you know B has established a connection with their locally. A also opens up an SAP value to indicate the connection, and sends a confirmation to B to establish the connection. Switchport port-security mac-address sticky 00b0.1111.2222 ? R1 and R2 are private partners. Some special traffic may need to be protected. Therefore , the dedicated line between R1 and R2 is added. If you want to ensure the traffic between 1.1.1.0 and 2.2.2.0 is exchanged through the leased line (running) the RIP ) away, when the green DOWN , only to take the following multi-access network. Static Routing Case PBR 88 Is 2 , 3 with AS the first comparison, 2 is MED small it is preferable; 2 with a further comparison, since the opening of the always-compare-med Take the configuration of R2 as an example: We still have to implement R4 access to 100.0.1.0 network to go R1 , access 100.0.2.0 network to go to R2 , this time we adjust MED , Passive-interface configuration Route Control Overview 77 One solution is that SW1 does not insert opiton82 , another method is to use the configuration on the DHCPserver : Redistribute connected route-map test DNS , WWW , and SMTP servers belong to the same subnet In the same network topology, if there are two different routing protocols,ccnp tshoot difficulty, because the mechanisms of different routing protocols are different, the understanding of routing is different, which causes the isolation of routing information in the network. This is most likely a network within the same autonomous system. The entire network needs to be interoperable. What should I do? This requires the use of routing re-release.