cisco ccna vce

cisco ccna vce

Route-target export 2345:5 L1 (inside the area) and L2 (in the area) R1#traceroute 4.4.4.4 Interface tunnel0 Fa0/0 Route summary example 2 on the L2 router *Aug 18 09:06:07.919: 10.1.12.1 (Strict IPv4 Prefix, 8 bytes, /32) 302 Network 10.1.34.4 0.0.0.0 area 0 1178 Use the above command to view the TE metric. By default, if the synchronization is not completed,cisco ccna vce, the IGP does not explicitly know the time to wait before establishing the adjacency relationship. Mpls ldp neighbor 1.1.1.1 targeted ldp Network 10.1.45.4 0.0.0.0 area 0 Class of data – The FEC which is mapped onto it Next-address 10.1.34.4 *Aug 18 09:06:02.699: Setup Prio: 7, Holding Prio: 7 Now, shut down the e0/1 port of R2 . Max_reservable_bw_sub: 0 ​​(kbps) Then we wait for the BGP neighbor relationship on R2 to be established. You can debug it: Route summary divides the original segment of LSP into two segments 104 *Aug 18 09:06:02.699: IS Hops:1 The two important thresholds in the LSP remaining time field are: LSP maxage and LSP refresh interval Intermediate System Intermediate System The routing protocol in the IP network forwards the data packet according to the minimum metric principle. Router isis Mpls label range 100 199 Fa0/0 *Aug 18 04:37:06.243: version = 0 length in words = 7 *Aug 18 11:26:02.546: Router isis Ip cef 10.1.34.4 Ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 Protect lsp path: 10.1.12.1 10.1.12.2 Configuration change Network 10.1.12.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 Local binding: tag: 102 In a CISCO IOS router without IPv6 capability, the general rules for load balancing packetized packets are as follows: Configure MPLS TE tunnel on R1 . *Aug 18 09:06:07.919: Interface IP Address: 10.1.12.1 Physical BW: 100000 kbits/sec *Aug 18 09:06:07.919: Error Value: 0x5 (No route available toward destination) FR The DLCI Routing information diffusion in point-to-point links Next-address 10.1.45.5 *Aug 18 04:37:06.239: Tun Sender: 1.1.1.1 LSP ID: 20 Explicit Route: 10.1.12.2 10.1.23.2 10.1.23.3 10.1.34.3 Ciphertext interface authentication Tunnel mpls traffic-eng record-route *Aug 18 09:06:02.699: SENDER_TEMPLATE type 7 length 12: 0x00000036 ISO10589 R1.00-00 R2 has sent IIH , but R1 does not recognize it because R2 does not have configuration authentication, which will cause R1 not to put R2 into its own IIH and send it back to R2 (included in the IS neighbors of the TLV ). A password is assigned to the R2fa0/0 port, and the adjacency is normal. By capturing the packet, it can be seen that the TLV for authentication has been included in the IIH , and the authentication password exists in the form of plaintext in the TLV .