dumps 200-125 latest 1 2018

dumps 200-125 latest 1 2018

GW configuration Exit 43200 43200 Image TCP Test Description: in R3 on of ping FF04 ::. 1 , the local interface Loopback0 Ipv6 router ospf 1 router-id 2.2.2.2 Becomes 24 bits, appears in HELLO package, DBD package, and router LSA , network LSA , interAreaRouter LSA , Link LSA Access-list 1 permit any route-map PBR permit 10 match ip address 1 Image PBR (Policy Routing) Therefore ,dumps 200-125 latest 1 2018, the fragmentation of IPv6 is not performed on the intermediate router. When the path MTU is smaller than the packet to be transmitted, the source node itself fragments the packet. Tunnel mode ipv6ip isatap R2(config)# access-list 1 deny 192.168.3.0 R2(config)# access-list 1 permit any R2(config)# router rip When debugging , you can open debug ipv6 nd The route to the OR2 loopback interface is found . The next hop is FE80::5C10:8CFF:FEE0:FE89 , which is the link-local address of the OR2 interface. In the original Ipv6 environment, an interface often has multiple Ipv6 addresses, and OSPF. The maintenance of neighbor relationships is based on stability. The link-local address that is necessary for each interface becomes the best way to establish neighbor relationships. Why is ping unreachable? Because this is a frame relay environment, FE80::5C10:8CFF:FEE0:FE89 is the IPV6 address. There is no mapping on OR1 , and OR2 is the same. Therefore, the frame of the link-local address of each peer is added. Follow the mapping.