ccnp 300-101 exam

ccnp 300-101 exam

If the routes are from EBGP neighbors, it is preferred that the oldest EBGP neighbor came routing, reduce the impact of the roll (this provision mainly EBGP Fa0/20 200 i It has to be emphasized here that the premise that the network can deploy route summarization is that the IP subnet and network model design have certain scientific and rationality, so the route summarization and the design of the network IP subnet and network model are closely related. Tag rewrite with Fa0/0, 10.1.12.2, tags imposed: {} To this end, some organizations and manufacturers propose to layer the data link layer, which is divided into logical link control sub-layer ( LLC ) and media access control sub-layer ( MAC ). Such different physical layers correspond to different MAC sublayers, and the LLC sublayer can be completely independent. As shown in Figure 1-4 . Show interface | include bia 100 SW3#sh int tru SW2(config)# interface vlan 10 Interface fast0/24 Neighbor 10.1.12.2 send-community R2#sh ip b 100.100.100.0 Unused 192.168.1.0/24 30.30.30.0/24 or: 1 Network 172.16.11.0 mask 255.255.255.0 If an external route carrying a tag is advertised on R1 and OSPF is redeployed to EIGRP on R2 , then the route is advertised. Then between R3 and R4 is the federal IBGP relationship, and between R4 and R5 is the federal EBGP relationship. 10.1.13.1 1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets Weight Network basic configuration Port-Security secure address: secure MAC address Based on the above experiment, R1 passes the 11.11.11.0/24 route to R2 ,ccnp 300-101 exam, carrying the community value of 100:11 . This value can be matched on R2 using ip community-list , which can be further used in route-map . This community-list goes to set the policy. We now R2 on a community-list to match the 100: 11 , a notification to add no-export the community to the route. You can also use the show ip dhcp bingding to capture the client-identifier of the client on the server. The Layer 2 switch searches for VLAN configuration information based on the destination MAC address and VLAN ID of the frame, and determines from which port the frame is sent out. Neighbor 10.1.13.3 remote-as 345 We found a very strange phenomenon. R4 eventually went to 100.0 and both networks chose 3.3.3.3 as the next hop instead of metric . Why? Originally, the MED attribute, the BGP router only compares the MED values of the routes originating from the same host by default , and R1 and R2 belong to AS100 and AS200 respectively . Then, for R4 , the two paths of the 100.0.1.0 route are from different ASs , the default It bypasses the MED comparison, and finally, the rule that affects the routing is: " The RID of the BGP neighbor (the smaller the priority).