ccna exam dumps 2019

ccna exam dumps 2019

[Experiment 6 ] There are subnet routes, the subnet route prefix length is different (matching and mismatching), and the matching route is taken. Describe whether the router is running MOSPF PC configuration Use the Linklocal address as the source address of the protocol packet and send a RIPng message to the neighboring RIPng router. Use FF02::9 as RIPng Disadvantages: Each device needs to be configured with two protocols, which need to occupy resources. The device needs to store two routing tables (if it is a router), and each protocol needs to be processed independently. Ipv6 address 2001::1/128 Between R1 , R2 and Layer 3 switches, it is assumed to be a static routing environment. So now, we hope that users under R3 will flow in the direction indicated by the red dotted arrow when accessing the production server, and will flow in the direction of the blue arrow when accessing the office server. The NIC is configured with an IP address of 1.1.1.1/24 and the gateway is 1.1.1.54. Router(config)#router rip Show ip cef exact-route src-addr dest-addr * i2003::3/128 Ipv6 unicast-routing 2 : RIP-2 ; Match ip address 1 set metric 20 !! ipv4 routing, so that the route can access the tunnel destination , which is 10.1.23.3 Invalidation timer Route redirection Test Description: in R3 on of ping FF04 ::. 1 , the local interface Loopback0 Ipv6 route 2002::/16 tunnel1 !! When accessing the remote 6to4 network locally , take the tunnel Experiment 2 Holddown defaults to 0 , which means that the garbage-collect default 120S is not used. All node multicast addresses Router ospf 1 Ip address 10.1.34.3 255.255.255.0 But you need to pay special attention to the reachability of next-hop . OSPF ! Image Virtual-PPP Virtual PPP interface This mechanism is now useless. Configuring the sample EIGRP environment Difficult analysis IPv6 !! wherein 2.2.2.2 is R2 of Router-ID , attention since 100.1.1.0 in R3 of OSPF Holddown timers are ignored in some versions of IOS , that is, they do not take effect even if they are set. Redistribute connected route-map test So how do you perform an accurate calculation of the summary route ? Let's look at an example: Test phenomenon: can ping through IPv6 Address(es): FE80::FFFF:FE10:1 Image ! CISCO data forwarding method Interface fastEthernet 1/0 ipv6 enable 6PE basic experiment Image IPv6 addresses can be obtained through state configuration and stateless configuration , simply say 3.0 this route. This is an example of the use of a distribution list. Of course, it has a wider range of applications. 00 Ge ge-value Whether the hop limit of the IPv6 header of the RA packet is 255 . Because only 255 means that it is generated by the router in the local network. Assume that R1 is the stub node in the network structure. Therefore, on R2 , the extra routes are filtered out, and only the F1 and 0- port routes of R3 are advertised to R1 . We filter out specific routes on R2 : ! Ipv6 address 2001:12::1/64 PE1 , P , and PE2 form an LDP neighbor relationship and deliver IGP labels. *Mar 1 17:40:49.495: BGP(0): FE80::CE02:8FF:FED8:0 rcv UPDATE w/ attr: nexthop 254.128.0.0, origin i, !! Prefix readdressing Image The configuration of R1 is as follows: Ipv6 address 2001:45::4/64 Epoch 0 Protocol ID: 0x86DD R1 , the subsequent packets should not exceed 1400 bytes. The capture of this process is as follows: FIG Ibid, 4.0 after hang, C sends message poisoning message, theoretically 4.0 routing is C advertised to B , the principle of the horizontal division, B is not the C advertised 4.0 information, but with a level of toxicity reversal split broke this principle, B periodically to C sends 4.0 poison reverse messages to let C know,ccna exam dumps 2019, his neighbors knew a 4.0 hang message and waiting eagerly 4.0 resurrected place full of blood, another benefit of doing so is avoid loops, at least C is not from B to go visit 4.0 a.