200-125 ccna dumps free

200-125 ccna dumps free

Bgp router-id 3.3.3.3 E : global scope; At the same time network 1.0.0.0 , then 1.0.0.0 will be announced R2#sh isis neighbors detail Route-target import 234:4 / / There is a S entry in the routing table Neighbor FE80::CE01:8FF:FED8:10 remote-as 12 Ipv6 nat v6v4 source list ipv6only-network pool v6v4-pool Router ospf 100 The NIC is configured with an IP address of 1.1.1.1/24 and the gateway is 1.1.1.54. // The offset value is increased by the value displayed in the normal route entry. It is added on the original basis instead of replacing the original hop count. # 102.54.94.97 Next Hop Remarks Image CE1 The IPv6 routing to put PE1 , PE1 created on IPv6 in the VRF ,200-125 ccna dumps free, the Fa0 / 0 Kou into the VRF . PE1 learned through BGP As defined in RFC3053 , a tunneling agent is an external system, not a router. It acts as a server in an IPv4 network and accepts tunnel requests from dual-stack nodes. Image !! Take the main class route Bgp router-id 2.2.2.2 Image FF01::2 node local range all router multicast address ! Match tag matches based on the tag of the route Valid lifetime ( ! Valid Lifetime ) --- 202.101.100.2 Image Ipv6 address 2001:0001::FFFF/64 Encapsulating Security Payload header Encapsulating Security Payload Header (Protocol 51 ) Sending 1, 1500-byte ICMP Echos to 2034::4, timeout is 2 seconds: Flag / option Image R1 , the subsequent packets should not exceed 1400 bytes. The capture of this process is as follows: Please see the three cups of Black Tea " IPv6 Notes", visit ccietea.com for the latest version. Ipv6 address 2001::1/64 NAT-PT is recommended when single-protocol networks need to communicate with each other . Mechanism overview Image Y 2204 R2(config-router)#redistribute rip subnets 0/0/0 Ip sla monitor 1 2001:1::1 Routers can learn routing entries in a variety of ways: static manual configuration, various dynamic routing protocols, and more. When the router learns two routes to the same destination from two different ways, the router compares the AD values ​​of the two routes , that is, the management distance, preferably the route with a small AD value. If the AD values ​​are equal, for example, the same routing protocol, the metric value is further compared . Of course, this also involves the working mechanism problem of different routing protocols, which is specifically discussed for different routing protocols. As shown in the following figure, R3 and R1 run the RIP protocol, and R3 establishes adjacency relationship with R2 through OSPF . Therefore, R3 learns the route to the destination 1.1.1.0/24 from RIP and OSPF . The two routes use R1 and R2 as the next hop respectively. Then R3 finally chooses the OSPF route to be loaded into the routing table, which is to use R2 as the actual destination.