cisco ccna mock exam

cisco ccna mock exam

Network 10.1.12.1 0.0.0.0 area 0 *Aug 18 04:37:06.243: Note that at this time, although the LDP adjacency between R1 and R2 has been broken, in principle, LDP does not adjacency, in the case of synchronizing, ISO10589 Support 0-7 total 8 tunnel priority levels *Aug 18 09:06:07.919: Refresh Period (msec): 30000 10.1.123.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0 0.0.0.0/0 [115/10] via 10.1.123.3, FastEthernet0/0 The PATH message is sent to the end of the hop by one hop; the RESV message is sent to the headend router in the opposite direction. The configuration of R1 is as follows: 0 kbits/sec Route-map test permit 10 router isis 0x3B83 Point2 ! *Aug 18 09:06:02.699: Session Name: R1_t0 In RFC5250 In been described herein: A neighbor Capable IS-opaque and only IF The IF IT sets-O 'bit in the Options The ITS Database Field of the Description packets; The-O' bit the NOT SHOULD BE SET When ignored and the MUST BE Error metric optional, link error probability, not supported 75000 Interface FastEthernet0/0 L1/L2 router *Aug 18 09:06:07.919: SENDER_TSPEC type 2 length 36: Mpls traffic-eng router-id loopback0 mpls traffic-eng area 0 MTU implicit check Ensure reliable diffusion of LSPs on point-to-point links Is-type level-1 Router(config-if)#tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng Prefix The configuration of R2 is supplemented as follows: Interface Address : 10.1.12.1 Admin Metric : 1 75000 The Global Pool Sub Pool !! interface is the bandwidth pool for each priority tunnel OSPF divides areas based on interfaces. Routers can belong to different areas. 10.1.34.0/24 Finally,cisco ccna mock exam, the path of the second TE tunnel is as follows: The checksum calculation knows the end of the packet starting from the field after the remaining time-to-live field in the LSP . When the LSP copy is propagated between routers in the network, its checksum field is not modified. MPLS coding Network 10.1.34.4 0.0.0.0 area 0 We can avoid this problem by using overload-bit . The command is explained as follows (configured under the router isis process): Mpls traffic-eng tunnels mpls label range 500 599 Router isis Now activated R1 is fast-reroute features modified R1 of Tunnel port configured as follows: 0x2F89 Priority 6 : 9375000 Reservable Bandwidth[7]: LAN Priority: 64 Format: Phase V For the highest loopback port IP Used to confirm and request link status information Restrictions: *Aug 18 09:06:07.919: SENDER_TSPEC type 2 length 36: Route-map test permit 10 router isis Ip router isis Type-10 Opaque Link Area Link States (Area 0) IGP Id: 1.1.1.1, MPLS TE Id: 1.1.1.1 Router Node id 1 About 30.0 / 24 prefix, C allocates a label 23 , the mapping is transmitted to the B ; B local to 30.0 / 24 allocates a label 22 , the mapping is transmitted to the A . In interface configuration mode: isis circuit-type allows the interface to work at level-1 level-1-2 or level-2-only *Aug 18 11:26:02.546: I mentioned the four metric types of IS-IS . The bits that can be used in each metric are the lower 6 bits. That is to say, the maximum interface metric is 63. We propose several new TLVs to make up for this defect. Next, you can test the forwarding of traffic on R1 . 0x0000000C IS R3.00 The loopback0 address space of all devices is xxxx/32 , and x is the device number. The third layer destination IP matches the packet with the same specific prefix. Activate the MPLS TE extension for each router's OSPF and manually set the RouterID for MPLS TE . *Aug 18 04:37:06.239: Tun Dest: 5.5.5.5 Tun ID: 0 Ext Tun ID: 1.1.1.1 Router isis Extended IP reachability reachability TLV (type 135 ) Clear text interface authentication Use show isis hostname to view the mapping of host names !! It can be seen that the f0/0 port has been separated by 33M. Configure on R2 as follows: 10.1.12.0/24 Error metric Network 10.1.24.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 Redistribute isis ip level-2 into level-1 route-map test 1.0.0.0 SENDER_TEMPLATE Tunnel: 1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets System Id Network 10.1.12.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 IS ( layer 0 routing ), then the router will look up the destination address and forward the packet along the best path. Message The mere motivation to set up overload due to insufficient device resources is now running out. After all, the performance of the device is getting better and better. 10.1.23.2 Bw[1]: Remote binding: tsr: 2.2.2.2:0, tag: 203 The path calculation of the MPLS TE tunnel requires relevant information to be performed. Then we need to use a link state routing protocol to flood the link information to all routers running TE in the network . After collecting the information, the TE router establishes its own MPLS TE Database .