ccnp route passed

ccnp route passed

Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned Weight The configuration of R4 is as follows: B and C receive this better BPDU and continue to flood the network. Neighbor authentication Packets with destination addresses that do not exist at the beginning of 192.168 are discarded directly. Normal traffic on other subnets of the 192.168 intranet will be forwarded according to the longest matching principle. RR can modify the cluster-id 1.1.1.1 CAM and TCAM None It can be seen that the AS_CONFED_SEQENCE attribute is used in the federal inner ring (this attribute will not be federated),ccnp route passed, while the above Ip prefix-list 11 permit 11.11.11.0/24 route-map test permit 10 Interface trust status and network security issues The rules for BGP next-hop are as follows: 10.1.23.2 Interface FastEthernet0/1 switchport access vlan 10 Router(config-router)# distance AD ip-src wildmask acls OSPF redistributes routes to RIP : 100 This global configuration command enables PBR to take effect on locally originated traffic. These three representative routing re-release models. Unused Aging Type : Absolute SecureStatic Address Aging : Disabled Route-map nat2 permit 10 match ip address 1 How to judge whether there is arp spoofing in the intranet Gateway of last resort is 172.16.3.0 to network 172.16.0.0 We look at the above chart, two switches trunk both ends of the native vlan is not the same, what's the problem? First, the vlan2 communication at both ends is certainly no problem, but the communication between vlan3 and vlan4 has a problem . The data frame sent by the user of the left vlan3 goes out of the trunk from the left switch , and is not tagged, but these data frames are sent to the right switch. It will think that these data frames belong to vlan4 , which is a problem.