ccnp route switch

ccnp route switch

After a few seconds, D receive this the BPDU , Block out port P1 Can the other party receive the route? What if R1 is RR ? Note that CLIENT does not know its identity. Route Dampening Neighbor 10.1.23.3 dmzlink-bw TCP connection establishment was successful, starts sending Open package,ccnp route switch, Open packet carries establish parameter negotiation peer. Neighbor authentication Route-map test permit/deny 20 When, the AS_PATH only AS300 , 400 , and thus be B router to accept a summary of the article (because do not see their own AS number appears in RouterID : 172.16.8.1 Solution 2 : Free arp BGP table on R4 : The route for no-export cannot be more or less. No-export Knowledge review Now, we have to go through the calculations to get a summary of the segments that are just "inclusive". Ip prefix-list 11 deny 12.12.12.0/24 ip prefix-list 11 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 router bgp 100 Fa0/20 Neighbor 5.5.5.5 update-source Loopback0 no auto-summary If R1 turns on auto-summary and network 1.1.1.0 , the announcement is unsuccessful. BVI Bridge-Group Virtual Interface Bgp bestpath med missing-as-worst Next Hop OSPFpassive-interface neither sends nor receives routing updates, nor does it send HELLO packets. Route-map test permit 20 Ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.23.3 Clear ip bgp * Sw1(config-if-range)#channel-group 1 mode desirable Sw1(config-if-range)#no shutdown Interface fast0/1 neighbor to mean), BGP The network command, only the local routing loaded into BGP one way process. Match ip address prefix-list 30 set community 300:30 R1 , R2 running OSPF , R2 learned 1.1.1.0/24 the OSPF routing ( Metric to 65 ) in R2 on the BGP routing process in the network 1.1.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 In the above figure, if both ends of the PC belong to vlan10d , if the fa0/23 port of SW1 will vlan10remove off, then the PC will definitely not be able to communicate. These are all done by VTP pruning auto-negotiation. Case PBR 88 Neighbor 10.1.13.1 remote-as 100 ? This idea has been applied to dynamic routing protocols such as OSPF . Careful children's shoes will find that after you deploy route summarization in OSPF , it will automatically generate a summary route pointing to null0 locally . The reason is explained above. the same. As shown in the figure on the left, if the PC wants to Telnet the switch, first the PC should be able to ping the switch. Secondly, the VTY should be activated on the switch and the password should be configured. Then we create a VLAN 10 on the Layer 2 switch , assign the F0/1 port to VLAN 10 , and configure an IP address for the logical interface of VLAN 10 of the Layer 2 switch , and the IP of the same network segment as the PC . In this way, the PC can access the switch. But the problem is coming, so that the PC and the switch are on the same network segment and the same VLAN . In case there is a conflict between the IP address configured by the PC and the switch, we can consider dividing the switch into one. Separate VLANs for managing these switches. This VLAN is suitable for the entire traffic network, unified VLAN and unified IP.Planning, it is the management VLAN , so the management VLAN is not a specific VLAN , not VLAN1 , which is a misunderstanding of many people. In general, we will use a more "unprecedented" VLAN ID and IP , such as VLAN255 in this lab , and the network segment.