ccnp switch questions and answers pdf

ccnp switch questions and answers pdf

When ISP1 when down, and GW connected ISP1 interface not DOWN (such as closing ISP1 the CDP ), since the GW lost ISP1 of CDP Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 60 Default-metric x 100 i 15 Configuration Revision 17 Packets Network 10.1.45.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 Add redundant routing 9 Ip rip trigger 31 The traditional STP , which is 802.1D , is that all VLANs share a spanning tree. The advantage of this is that the switch does not use too much resources to calculate multiple spanning trees. However, the defect is that the port is fixed through the block . As a result, traffic on the network only goes to one side, and some links have no traffic at all, which wastes bandwidth. VTP Operating Mode : Server Maximum VLANs supported locally 1005 Dialer Dialer interface Router ospf 1 345 Access permanent nontrunking mode and negotiate with the peer interface to make it a nontrunking link Roo also received the request, and the request it received from the network segment 172.16.20.0 , and the table found that the network that the route to the host Milne is located ( 172.16.21.0 ) is different from the network that received the arp request packet. And the interface opens the arp proxy, so reply to its own interface mac. BGP routing table entry for 1.1.1.0/24, version 2 e / / Is to shield the route from the RIP re-released in addition to 1.1.1.0 , and re-release the local direct connection Bgp connected eigrp 10.1.13.3 Capture the package as follows: For the above problem, we can set the Fa0/0 port on the router to passive-interface . As a result, the interface will not send OSPF Hello messages. At the same time, the network segment 192.168.1.0/24 associated with the interface will still be Be declared into OSPF so that you can avoid unnecessary A very simple method, assuming R3 on the R3 , the first RIP to OSPF route re-release,ccnp switch questions and answers pdf, as already mentioned, a direct problem is on R2 , due to the 192.168.1.0/24 route, and from OSPF and RIP learned, and OSPF the AD value is small, thereby resulting in sub-optimal path, so in order to circumvent this problem, we can directly in R2 deployment on the distribution list, so that the OSPF routing is not loaded into the routing table, in order to avoid suboptimal Path problem.