ccnp switch salary

ccnp switch salary

Access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 route-map test permit 10 100 R1 and R3 , R2, and R5 establish an EBGP neighbor relationship. Neighbor 10.1.23.3 local-as 201 no-prepend ... If it is injected through the aggregate-address command, next-hop is equal to the update source IP of the summary router . ARP Ip prefix-list 1 permit 11.11.11.0/24 ip prefix-list 2 permit 12.12.12.0/24 route-map RP1 permit 10 Improve security, reduce the number of subnets, and increase IP utilization R2(config)# access-list 1 deny 192.168.3.0 R2(config)# access-list 1 permit any R2(config)# router rip Ip dhcp snooping vlan 10 Interface fast0/1 Neighbor 10.1.23.3 remote-as 300 neighbor 10.1.23.3 route-map test out Neighbor 1.1.23.2 route-map test out After a few seconds, D receive this the BPDU , Block out port P1 Port Vlans allowed on trunk At the same time, the two routes are marked in the BGP table: " *> ", indicating that the two routes are valid , and the best or optimal, best , so they will be passed to the IBGP neighbor of R3 . That is R4 The lower the value is set, the higher the protection level for the CPU . This value takes effect before and after the penalty action occurs. Of course, this value cannot be set too low. At least the legal traffic must be processed. Generally less than 1000 is almost the same. The configuration of R2 is as follows: When we set the number of MAC addresses allowed on the interface to 1 and set a secure address for the interface, then this interface will only be for that MAC. !! GW has no other configuration about routing Path not synced, but sync is on After completing the above steps, the logical etherchannel interface is set up. Apply the configured ARP ACL to the DAI. Sw1(config)#interface port-channel 1 // Enter port-channel group 1 to configure IP Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer Bibliography Router ospf 3 Finally, look at DP , which is also relatively simple as shown. We take SW3 and SW4 between the segment , for example, due SW3 and SW4 will have BPDU , and SW3 issued SW4 of BPDU obviously superior to SW4 this interface to send generated from its own BPDU , so the final SW4 interfaces win. After completing the above steps, the logical etherchannel interface is set up. Hello time root bridge sends configuration BPDU default interval 2 is S SW1 and SW2 are configured as VTP mode client ; SW3 is configured as VTP mode Server The origin of the distance vector name is because the route is advertised in the form of a vector (distance, direction), where the distance is defined according to the metric, and the direction is defined according to the next hop router. Adding redundant routing R2(config-router)# distribute-list 1 in fa0/0 At this time , the policy is used for R4 on R1 , and the route AS_PATH of 10.0 is inserted into the AS number of 100 100 , and R5 is preferably R3 . Why on R5 will select R3 , through experimental results, where R5 received two routes, one from the Federal EBGP neighbors, one from EBGP neighbors, the final preferred EBGP routing neighbors. (Optional) Configuring the security address aging time When the network topology changes, the switch that first recognizes the change will send a TCN BPDU . The switch sends a TCN when the following times occur : Access switch configuration: Just match this AS_PATH of 100 Multilink Multilink-group interface In R2 opened on loopback interfaces 2.2.2.0/24 , R2 both redistributed RIP into OSPF , they redistribute directly connected into OSPF Note that the as-path access-list is also implicitly rejecting all by default. Offset-list offset list Distance vector routing protocol 28 The neighbor advertises the route. 100.1.1.0/24 . At the same time, this re-release becomes the summary route of OSPF . Even if two ASBRs are returned , because there is a static summary route locally, the summary route of OSPF is directly ignored , and sub-optimal is not generated. Path,ccnp switch salary, this route will not be re-released back to RIP and cause other problems. Neighbor R3 filter-list 1 weight 4000 *> 11.11.11.0/24 Bgp confederation identifier 345 neighbor 4.4.4.4 remote-as 64512 IP CEF switching turbo vector Optional delivery to simplify the execution of routing policies Obviously, the DHCP server is aware of the above problem, and the action it takes is to ignore this DHCP request. Therefore the PC cannot get the address. Route-map test permit 20 match ip address 2 Open loopback on R2 , IP is 172.16.10.0/24 , 172.16.11.0/24 R1 R3 A valid entry in the database matches these ARP packets. R1 is in AS100 and routes 1.1.1.0/24 to EBGP neighbor R2 . During the above events, the contents of the following fields will not change: ... Configure Port Security Rate Limiter BGP Before routing 0bits must 0.0.0.0 ago 0 Ge bit match, in fact, all the bits does not matter, but also for the mask, that did not write ge keyword is implicit so ge 0 Le 32 , that is, cover The code length is greater than 0 and less than or equal to 32 . So this prefix list is permit The BGP election routeriID rule is the same as OSPF . Holddown timer expired Origin file flash:CCIE.txt The configuration is as follows: Very thorough analysis of the foregoing, when the RIP to OSPF do two-dot weight when released, since the routing is injected into OSPF later, the AD becomes 110 , then transmitted to the route R2 , R3 Thereafter, since OSPF the AD than RIP smaller Therefore, the OSPF route will overwrite the RIP , resulting in a sub-optimal path. Then, we can use ACL and other tools to capture the routes in the RIP domain on R2 and R3 , and then adjust the AD values ​​of these routes to be larger than RIP in the OSPF process . Then, these routes are RIP routes will not be overwritten, and suboptimal path problems can be circumvented.