ccnp 300-115 book pdf

ccnp 300-115 book pdf

---- -------------------- Can not contain Outline The EBGP route is set to a small AD value of 20 . Ip prefix-list 30 permit 30.30.30.0/24 route-map setComm permit 10 BGP anti-ring is implemented through AS_PATH , and AS_PATH is only changed after the route leaves the AS . Therefore , IBGP does not have EBGP anti-ring capability in the AS . To prevent loops, BGP routers will not be from IBGP neighbors. The learned route is advertised to other IBGP neighbors. Match abd , abcd , abcdefg, etc. Preferably EBGP route 20 Two-point two-way route is re-released The IP header is 20 bytes, the ICMP header is 8 bytes, and the ICMP data payload is 1472 bytes, which is exactly 1500 bytes. Therefore, on the CISCO IOS device, the size followed by the ping refers to the entire size of the outgoing IP packet. Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best Originator: 1.1.1.1, Cluster list: 2.2.2.2 Secret level Port number 521 By modifying LOCAL_PREF to affect the flow properties Multilink Multilink-group interface First define the track object , associated with an ip sla monitor Hardware-address hardware-address type This summary route generated locally is 172.16.0.0/16 ,ccnp 300-115 book pdf, NH=0.0.0.0 , weight= default value 32768 , origin=i . The detail route is marked as " s " and is therefore suppressed. 32 bits Access Switch SW1 is turned on DHCP Snooping , inserted Option82 ; : 1 The switch sends data frames according to the discovered outbound interface. Ip prefix-list 1 seq 5 permit 100.0.1.0/24 ip prefix-list 2 seq 5 permit 100.0.2.0/24 route-map test permit 10 2.2.2.0 Routing Although the next hop is directed to R1 , it does not use the outbound interface to create routing entries. From the experimental phenomenon, it is not matched by the match . Needless to say, 3.3.3.0 , the associated interface is s0/1 . This strategy, we can also do on R3 , but the implementation direction of the strategy is in . Ip route 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.12.1 For R2 , it is now in its own process 1 , while learning the route of this OE2 from R1 and R3 , how will it choose? Review We look at the above picture, the external detail route 172.16.32.0 – 39.0/24 , and the summary route 32.0/21 are introduced into OSPF by R1 , now ICMP redirect 8 Ip arp inspection vlan {vlan_ID | vlan_range} 200 i Protocol Interface Match community 11 When R2 Implementation points Next, look at RP , SW2 has two interfaces, both of which will receive BPDUs , all from SW1 , so the cost of the first two BPDUs to root is 0 , equal; the sender ID of the sender is due to the same switch, and therefore equal, less out; and then compare the two BPDU port ID , that is, SW1 on both port interface ID , we assume that the two interfaces equal priority, then the ratio of these two ports The interface ID , and finally select the root port F0/1 on SW2 .