ccna mock test pdf

ccna mock test pdf

*Aug 18 04:37:06.239: Tun Dest: 5.5.5.5 Tun ID: 0 Ext Tun ID: 1.1.1.1 Mpls ldp neighbor 3.3.3.3 targeted ldp Ip address 10.1.45.4 255.255.255.0 R1#show ip cef 4.4.4.4 The configuration of R1 is as follows: Interface eth 0/0 Such as LDP ID = 1.1.1.1:0 Neighbor relationship establishment Traffic using traffic engineering uses source-based routing instead of routing based on destination IP address Reservable Bandwidth[2]: Mpls traffic-eng tunnels ip rsvp bandwidth TE tunnels are an aggregation of traffic flows of the same class (bandwidth , etc.) which are placed inside a common MPLS LSP Interface eth 0/2 Router-id 1.1.1.1 55.55.55.55 [110/31] via 10.1.23.3, 00:03:44, Ethernet0/1 Ip address 55.55.55.55 255.255.255.255 Refresh Period (msec): 30000 Type-10 Opaque Link Area Link States (Area 0) RESV Pop tag Since everyone learned 4.4.4.4/32 through OSPF , all LSRs will generate a label locally for 4.4.4.4/32 , and then bind this label to the prefix and pass it to other LDP neighbors, as shown in the figure. Control label notification through LDP (conditional notification) Describes all LSP information in the LSP database . For example, in the above topology, R1 establish a to R4 of TE the Tunnel , all routers have declared their loopback into OSPF . All interfaces cost are 1 . L1 / L2router with the set attached-bit route-map associated with a route-map test deny the route-Map , it. Interface Loopback0 DIS no backup DIS , DIS can be preempted, DIS to 3 transmission times frequency Hello PDU ! Mpls traffic-eng area 1 R1(config-keychain)#key 1 IS-IS can route both CLNP and IP in mixed mode . 55.55.55.55 [110/2] via 0.0.0.0, 00:00:01, Tunnel0 Reservable Bandwidth[4]: Reservable Bandwidth[5]: 103 On a point-to-point link, once the adjacency is established, both ISs send CSNP packets. When a lost LSP is found , it is requested by PSNP . By default TE metric equal to the IGP Metric (This means that, without using the above command interface disposed in the physical,ccna mock test pdf, TE metric equal to the IGP Metric ) Net 49. 0001 .0000.0000.0001.00 After the configuration is complete, the level 2 LSP sent by R2 will carry the cipher text authentication TLV information (the level 1 LSP is not carried). If this configuration is maintained, we will find that R2 can only learn the R1 release. Routing, this is because level1 LSPs are not authenticated. After completing this experiment, R3 and R4 complete the configuration. 10.1.23.3 [MPLS: Label 300 Exp 0] 4 msec 0 msec 4 msec Mpls ldp neighbor 2.2.2.2 targeted ldp 10.1.13.3 // Prerequisites for advertising a label mapping message to a neighbor locally The configuration of R1 is as follows: SNPA ( Subnetwork point of attachment ) Based on the information in the link state database, the almost identical algorithm, the SPF algorithm, is used to calculate the optimal route. OSPF 's DR Thus, as long as 5.5.5.0 in R2 , then the routing table of R2 will, in its region to 49.0001 in flooding- LSP for the ATT is set, we can try to R5 of Loopback the shutdown , so 5.5.5.0 hung , and when R2 is detected this change, not found in the routing table 5.5.5.0/24 route, then R2 will trigger a LSP updates the LSP in the ATT not set, so a to R1 will only produce a Point to the default route for R3 . When 5.5.5.0 is restored, then R2 will generate an LSP and set ATT again (this 5.5.5.0The route does not have to be an ISIS route. You can play it with a route pointing to null0 , and set the ATT .) One thing to note here are: tools used to match the recommended route prefix list, I was in 12.