Free Cisco Written Dumps
For Top 50 Purchases 01:59:56


ccna 3

CCNA Routing And Switching 200-125 Written Dumps

( 15 People are currently looking at this product )

Exam Code: 200-125

Certification Provider: Cisco

Certification Exam Name:CCNA Routing & Switching

Update Date: Jan 27,2022

Free Cisco Written Dumps
For Top 50 Purchases
Latest Dumps
Numbers of Question & Answers

CCNA Routing & Switching Written Exam

Exam Number : 200-125 CCNA

Associated Certification : CCNA Routing & Switching

Duration : 75 minutes (55 - 65 questions)

Available Languages: English, Japanese

NOTE: This exam tests a candidate's knowledge and skills related to: Network fundamentals, LAN switching technologies, IPv4 and IPv6 routing technologies, WAN technologies, Infrastructure services, Infrastructure security, Infrastructure management.

ccna 3

Here is the most accurate CISCO CCIE WRITTEN exam questions and answers. All study materials need to be carefully selected by professional certification experts to ensure that you spend the least amount of money, time, and pass the high quality exam. There is also a professional service team that can customize your study plan for you to answer all your questions, PASSHOT's CCIE Written Dumps is definitely the biggest boost for you to test CCIE that helping you pass any Cisco exam at one time.

    ccna 3

  • 5478 Reviews
  • .......................................... ! 75000 Mpls label rangempls label range 100 199 interface fa0/0 For the device number, this IP is also the LDP routerID . Of course, if you are running in a single zone, you can use a full L1 router or a full L2 router solution. *Aug 18 11:31:44.598: !! activation level1 of MPLS TE ! Here there is a potential problem, because Level1 Router , do not know level2 routing (outside the region) information, instead of looking for the nearest L1 / L2 router to your destination, then it may appear sub-optimal path In order to solve this problem, IS-IS introduced a mechanism called route leakage. There are two types of tunnel priorities: Moreover, it is not necessary to maintain the matching time of both parties when establishing the adjacency relationship. Src,ccna 3, Dst, Tun_Id 0, Tun_Instance 2 RSVP Path Info: Name: R1_t0 Status: Network area 0 Now, we have to build a TE tunnel from R1 to R6 with a bandwidth requirement of 30M . Note that the available bandwidth in the network at the moment is due to the above. Network area 0 *Aug 18 09:06:07.919: Path Latency (microseconds):0 0/0/0 The configuration of R1 is as follows: Collects reachable NSAP prefix information, which is only used for inter-area ISO CLNP roads. Ip cef Ip explicit-path name R2R3R4 enable next-address R2-PE1#show mpls traffic-eng tunnels Interface eth 0/0 ... ... ... ... Pop tag Ip address Or ISIS will flood the LSP . Global Pool Label or VC Link IP Address: Label Mapping message ! Mpls ldp router-id loopback0 mpls label range 400 499 interface fast0/0 *Aug 18 11:26:02.546: (Link ID) Network/subnet number: (Link Data) Network Mask: Number of MTID metrics: 0 Summary of tag processing actions *Aug 18 09:06:07.919: average rate=250000 bytes/sec, burst depth=1000 bytes Tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 10 dynamic ! The authenticated TLV is not seen in the PSNP message . twenty two OutLabel : FastEthernet0/0, 200 RSVP Signalling Info: Finally, the path of the second TE tunnel is as follows: 0xA538 OAM is basically used for error detection, location, and monitoring implementation. This tag distinguishes between ordinary messages and OAM messages. CISCO IOS does not use tag 14 , which performs MPLS OAM but is not implemented by tag 14 . Area Address(es): 49.0001 SNPA: cc02.1ab0.0000 ! R2.00-00 ! Ip address Interface eth 0/0 ( NLPID 0x81 ) and IP ( 0xCC ) Fspec: ave rate=0 kbits, burst=1000 bytes, peak rate=0 kbits Route summarization on the L1/L2 router ( to level1 ) * 0x0000000C !! The outbound label is 301 ! However, there may be such a problem that the LDP connection between R1 and R2 is broken for some reason, but between R1 and R2 . R3(config-if)#tunnel mpls traffic-eng forwarding-adjacency ? // Prerequisites for advertising a label mapping message to a neighbor locally OSPF is LSADB Network area 0 PDU The L1 and L2 IIH PDUs on the LAN are sent to different multicast MAC addresses: L1 is 0180-C200-0014 , L2 is The PATH message is sent to the end of the hop by one hop; the RESV message is sent to the headend router in the opposite direction. Router-id i ia [115/148] via, FastEthernet0/0 i ia [115/158] via, FastEthernet0/0 i ia [115/158] via , FastEthernet0/0 C is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0 0x00000026 132 ! Affinity property Affinity Attributes and mask *Aug 18 09:06:07.919: version=0, length in words=7 LAN on the MAC or the X.25 , FR or ATM in the virtual circuit ID Explicit Route: Res. Sub BW: 0 kbits/sec Downstream:: Debug ip rsvp dump-messages Down Thresholds: 100 99 98 97 96 95 90 85 80 75 60 45 30 15 FastEthernet0/0, Src IP addr: Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident: 101 !! TE metric , the default is equal to the following IGP metric *Aug 18 04:37:06.239: Tun Dest: Tun ID: 0 Ext Tun ID: ! Priority 7 : 9375000 *Aug 18 09:06:02.699: Minimum Path Bandwidth (bytes/sec): 1250000 Prefix adjacent router Version:1 flags:0000 cksum:7931 ttl:255 reserved:0 length:132 Ip unnumbered Loopback0 tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng tunnel destination Link state Protocol Data Unit Link State Data Unit The trick of traditional IP routing: [MPLS: Label 203 Exp 0] 200 msec 84 msec 136 msec Et0/0 Layer 1 and Layer 2 set different metrics. *Aug 18 11:26:02.546: MPLS application RFC2966 standardized from Level2 to Level1 leaked routes 10 LSP Holdtime Physical Bandwidth: Physical bandwidth of the 100000 kbits/sec !! interface Kbps (Global) Priority: 6 6 Affinity: 0x0/0xFFFF Activate the fast-reroute feature on R1 and observe the phenomenon i ia [115/158] via, FastEthernet0/0 is subnetted, 4 subnets *Aug 18 09:06:07.919: ADSPEC type 2 length 48: 1/0/0 NSAP In the LAN , SNPA refers to the MAC address. Local tag Mpls traffic-eng reoptimize events link-up OO Tunnel mpls traffic-eng bandwidth 2000 Interface Loopback0 The configuration of R1 is as follows ( R2 does not open area password temporarily ): Fa0/0 *Aug 18 11:31:44.598: Nolabel/505 * 0x0000000C ISO10589 *Aug 18 04:37:06.239: version=0, length in words=7 [110/30] via, 00:00:01, Ethernet0/1 IS-IS by Hello PDU padding size to the interface MTU large Outgoing For example, R1 . 01 - 00, where R1 is SystemID (this is the system ID based on the host name ), 01 is the PseudonodeID pseudo node ID , and if it is sent by the pseudo node, it is non- 00 , 00 is the fragment number. Mpls traffic-eng tunnels mpls ip Kbps (Global) Priority: 7 7 Affinity: 0x0/0xFFFF Local [MPLS: Label 300 Exp 0] 108 msec 116 msec 64 msec Untagged CSPF calculates the path R1#show isis database verbose R1.00-00 The configuration of R5 is as follows: The PATHTear packet is similar to the PATH except that it is sent when the TE tunnel LSP created by the headend router needs to be removed . For example, the tunnel interface is manually shut down . Path: valid Link status changes The path calculation of the MPLS TE tunnel requires relevant information to be performed. Then we need to use a link state routing protocol to flood the link information to all routers running TE in the network . After collecting the information, the TE router establishes its own MPLS TE Database .

Have any question for us?

Cisco Dumps Popular Search:

ccna questions dump ccnp tshoot quick reference guide pdf ccie routing and switching lab version 400-051 CCIE Collaboration Written And Lab Exam Dumps ccie security v4.0 practice labs pdf download ccnp switch v7 skills based assessment ccnp 300-101 lab ccnp switch material 591lab cisco how to master ccnp switch pdf free download

Copyright © 2022 PASSHOT All rights reserved.