ccna 200-125 lab dumps

ccna 200-125 lab dumps

Indicates whether the router is running IPV6 and the packets sent by the router running OSPFv3 . This field is normally set to 1. Image Image The idea is the same as V6 access to V4 . Netsh interface ipv6 show address // Old prefix Local site address (Site-local address) Route-map first acquaintance Age Image FF01::2 node local range all router multicast address Image Requested node multicast address Solicited-node Immediate Outgoing interface list: :: Loopback address: :: 10: 0: 0: 0: 0: 1/128 or :: 1/128 Below we summarize some of the key points of the router about route lookup: Improve 134 Tag or VC in. These fields have special uses. It is allowed to write multiple next hop IPs , but these IPs must be the interface IP of the directly connected router . Interface FastEthernet1/0 Ipv6 access-list ipv6only-network permit 2001:1::/64 any Image Redirect message 137 Ipv6 address 2001:23::3/64 10.1.13.3 1 when the area to which an interface belongs is NSSA . Ipv6 dhcp pool DHCP-pool dns-server 2000::8 domain-name HelloWord exit What is the routing table for R3 ? In fact, without any impact, R3 can learn the routing of the entire network. As for why, I believe that it has been explained very clearly. Router(config)# ipv6 neighbor 2012::2 fastEthernet 0/0 cc01.0cf0.0000 R1# show ipv6 neighbors Interface FastEthernet0/1 [Experiment 5 ] There are subnet routes, the subnet route prefix length is different (but both match), and the longest match Wherein 33: 33: FF: 01: 00: 0B is ipv6 destination address FF02 :: 1: FF01: B multicast mapping. 4 : local management scope; Then just republish this static summary route into OSPF . In this way , the routers in OSPF can reach through this summary route. Mpls ldp router-id Loopback0 mpls label range 300 399 Router(config-rtr)# port x multicast-group X:X:X:X::X After the configuration is complete, the BGP connection between R2 and R3 can simultaneously deliver IPv4 and IPv6 route prefixes. The configuration of R2 is as follows: Neighbor FE80::CE01:8FF:FED8:10 update-source FastEthernet0/0 Se0/0 Neighbor 2001::1 update-source Loopback0 After R3 receives this ICMPv6 redirect message, subsequent packets will be sent directly to R2 ,ccna 200-125 lab dumps, so there is no need to bypass R1 . Dialer Dialer interface Ipv6 nd prefix 2001:0001::/64 Image Tag rewrite with Fa0/0, 10.1.12.2, tags imposed: {} Do the following configuration on R2 and test it ( all tested in no ip classless and closed ip cef environment ): Image Image E : global scope; X Different prefixes (network number + mask, indispensable), belonging to different routes in the routing table 1/128 If you want to turn off ICMP redirects, you need to use no ip redirects on the interface . Image S R3# Interface Loopback0 Ipv6 address 2001:1::FFFF/64 ipv6 nat ! Ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.23.3 Ipv6 address FE80::FFFF:FE10:5 link-local ipv6 router isis ! 4) A return packet, the data packet is sent to R2 , and R2 has a mapping of 2001:2::CA65:6402 to 202.101.100.1 , so R2 will Solution: Use distribution lists to circumvent suboptimal path problems IP policy routing is disabled Such as: 2001 : 00 a8 : 0 207 : 0000 : 0000 : 0000 : 0000 : 8207 Prefix readdressing CEF form As shown above, the R1 deployment, R1 use heavy publishing directly connected with the introduction of the three external routes, then out distribution lists direction only Invalidation timer Ipv6 route 2002:CA65:C01::/48 Tunnel0 The PMTU here refers to the one-way, the smallest of the data outbound MTU along the way . DAD Fast Switching :: Anycast Tunnel adapter isatap.{0DB7233C-89B7-49DB-A8C0-D1AA005F4E6A}: Version Next Hop !! Let R1 generate a packet with a message size of 1500 and send it to R4. Target Options Header (Protocol 60 ) First define the track object , associated with an ip sla monitor Note that the IPv4 prefix 192.88.99.0/24 here should be published to the routing protocol on the IPv4 Internet. Otherwise this 6to4 relay using the anycast prefix is unreachable in the IPv4 Internet. The requirements, methods and tools for implementing data access path control are often very many. If the basic elements such as IP and VLAN in the early stage of the network are very scientific and reasonable, then it is easier and more diverse to deploy in the strategy. This chapter does not discuss the various path control tools in detail. Just a few common tools and methods are discussed. In fact, using the tools learned in the past , such as route-map, etc.