200-125 pass4sure cisco dumps

200-125 pass4sure cisco dumps

<0-4294967295> [Test 4 ] *> 2001:1111::1/128 OSPF BGP router identifier 2.2.2.2, local AS number 12 BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 Neighbor 2002::2 activate Interface fastEthernet 0/0 ipv6 ospf 1 area 0 2 : RIP-2 ; The adjacency list in the CEF component is used for MAC or Layer 2 rewrite information. R2 's F0/0 port is configured with proxy ARP , 3.3.3.0 network R2 itself is reachable, so R2 will respond to this ARP request with its own F0/0 port MAC . In fact, this is an ARP spoofing behavior: ) Redistribute rip subnets route-map test * 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks S* 172.16.0.0/16 [1/0] via 172.16.3.0 Access-list 1 deny 192.168.13.0 access-list 1 permit any UDP RIP re-releases the default route Define a maximum value: define the maximum number of hops 15 hops, 16 hops unreachable to avoid routing loops Network 192.168.12.2 0.0.0.0 area 0 Generally, the IPv6 address space applied from the operator is /48 , and further planning by yourself according to the needs: as shown below: On R2 and R3 , there are two OSPF processes. If shown, one is OSPF1 and the other is OSPF2 . Note that this dual process is mainly implemented on the two ASBRs R2 and R3 . In other words, R1 is not required to have a default route locally. Type echo protocol ipIcmpEcho 10.1.1.2 source-ipaddr 10.1.1.1 frequency 10 Set interface specifies how to send such a packet set ip default next-hop specifies the next hop to be forwarded set ip next-hop specifies the next hop to forward Tag In IPv6 BGP transmitted between peers IPv4 routes Router(config-router)# distance ospf external ad1 inter-area ad2 intra-area ad3 Cannot be included in route calculation The configuration of R2 is as follows: 0100 – 01FF 1000 – 1FFF After changing the topology, the interface IP of R2 has changed. At this time , the RIP sent by R1 is updated, and the source address is still 192.168.12.1 . After receiving R2 , it finds that the interface IP that is updated with the local is not in a subnet, so R2 ignores the update message of R1 . In addition,200-125 pass4sure cisco dumps, the message sent by R2 to R1 is accepted by R1 , because R1 thinks that the RIP update message source address 192.168.12.5 sent by R2 is on the same subnet as its own interface.