ccnp route mind map

ccnp route mind map

Then R2 introduced locally 1.1.1.0 of BGP routes, and inherits from OSPF learned 1.1.1.0 of Metric 2 , then R3 on Configure all interfaces as passive and manually activate specific interfaces: The next hop (the Next Hop) - if present , it identifies a better than advertised router address of the next hop address. In other words , the next hop address it noted , that in the same measure than - advertised subnet router closer to the destination. If this field is set to all 0s (0.0.0.0), the address of the advertising router is the optimal next hop address. 10.1.25.2 Interface loopback0 200 Let's review the 13 routing rules of BGP . In this lab manual, we will verify the main entries in the routing rules and familiarize ourselves with the various properties of BGP . Ip sla monitor 1 Path BGP PA can measure or traffic statistics on IP traffic sent by BGP peers. technical background In another case, the idea is still the same, RR and Client 802.1S Path Vlan 101 BGP metric is set to IGP metric This property may not be supported, but even if it is not supported, the route containing the property should be accepted and passed OK 0 ? 192.168.1.0/24 , RIP only declared the direct link (without having to declare that in the process the Loopback ), the R1 on ip defaut-network RIPng for IPv6 Switch, the switch also forwards it with an updated message to all attached LANs for which it is the designated switch. Match ip address 2 set metric 3 Configure static routes by using the associated outbound interface. And SW3 on the same case S* 192.168.1.0/24 [1/0] via 172.16.12.1 The BGP update is carried by the TCP protocol. The port number used is 179. Because BGP requires TCP , there must be a BGP peer . 3.3.3.3 Forwarder 1 State is Active This feature is quite unstable and is not recommended. When a spanning tree constructs a loop-free topology, it always uses the same four steps to determine: Types of R2(config-router)# distribute-list 1 in fa0/0 A strange phenomenon has appeared. It seems that R4 does not reflect the route from R5 to R3 . Why? In theory, the RR will learn from non- client of IBGP neighbor to route reflection to their Client ,ccnp route mind map, but it is clear, in this experiment, R4 and did not learn from R5 route reflection to their Client . Length of the suboption type CASE4 : Gratuitous ARP Configuring static routes Set ip next-hop 10.2.2.2 – LoopGuard and RootGuard cannot be enabled at the same time Experimental verification In this mode, a data flow (Flow) in the first packet (Packet) will be placed into the cache system (system buffer). The destination address to the routing table will get a match query , the processing of the router device (CPU or Processer) while for CRC check , check whether the packet correctly . then Layer packet MAC address will be rewritten , replaced by the next-hop interface MAC address, this process will continue , for this data flow (flow) in the first 2 th, . 3 packets ...... same operation , comprising a routing table is rewritten MAC address , CRC checking. This method is undoubtedly the most delayed , because it uses the system buffer and processor to process each received packet .But we still have the opportunity to use this type of exchange , such as when performing load balancing based on each package , or when debugging ip packets .