ccnp switch validity

ccnp switch validity

The configuration of R3 is as follows: Interface Ip default-network 192.168.1.0 R2(config-router)# distribute-list 1 out fa 1/0 0-65535 ( 0x00000000-0x0000FFFF ) and 4294901760-429496729502710046 Difficult to resolve Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, multipath [abcd] If an external route carrying a tag is advertised on R1 and OSPF is redeployed to EIGRP on R2 , then the route is advertised. 10.1.23.2 The configuration of SW2 is as follows: Wherein SW1 is as follows: Experimental verification EIGRP UPDATE message Based on packet load balancing, all packets are rounded on the outgoing link. If you want to use message-based CEF load balancing,ccnp switch validity, you need to configure this command on all outbound interfaces. The buddy experiment has verified that it can indeed be per-packet load balancing. Access-list 1 permit 1.1.1.0 The configuration of R2 is similar to the above. The key is to look at the configuration of R3 : Same interface mode ( access , trunk ) What did you find? In the BGP table of R4 , there are redundant paths for the 100.0 network. However, in the final decision of BGP routing, R3 is selected as the next hop. The BGP only the best route ( Best , ie > tag) passed to the BGP neighbor, therefore, R4 nature is not to learn from R3 route and then sent back to the R3 's. Finally, although there are only one path for the two network segments of 100.0 on R3 , it does not prevent the network from achieving redundancy.