ccnp route dumps 300-101 pdf

ccnp route dumps 300-101 pdf

Configuration view and verification Ip community-list 11 permit 100:11 Bgp dampening ? Ip community-list 11 permit 100:11 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport mode trunk [123].[7-9] / / Detailed release Ok, then let's start the experiment below: If the MED attribute of a route is lost, the default setting is to set the MED to 0. However, if this command is configured, if the route with no MED value is received ,ccnp route dumps 300-101 pdf, the MED of the route is set to the maximum value of 4294, 9672, 95. In a real network environment, we may encounter a situation where there are two or more routing protocols in a network environment, for example: Weight Host 192.168.1.111 255.255.255.0 Adjacency table Vlan range and mapping Use show port-security address to view the security address entries on each port-security interface. Ip sla monitor 1 10.1.13.1 Redis ospf 1 route-map test Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd Database , this database is DHCP Snooping listens for DHCP information recorded after the interaction, inside contains the client's IP , the MAC , belongs to VLAN -related information, etc., and this information, just as ARP 's legality verification. Match 100 , 100 200 , 100 300 400, etc. ? ? The use of one-arm routing can solve the problem of data exchange between VLANs , but there are also various drawbacks, such as the interface of the router, the load is too large, and the traffic needs to enter and exit the interface or link twice, causing the load on the trunk link to be too heavy. And the scalability is particularly poor. Internal BGP Port-security does not support the destination interface of SPAN We can let DAI do further verification by configuring some additional options . There are three optional keywords, dst-mac , ip , src-mac Policy-list configuration 2 : Clear text verification; Policy-list Obviously, the DHCP server is aware of the above problem, and the action it takes is to ignore this DHCP request. Therefore the PC cannot get the address. The other side has received the Keepalive packet, the two sides agreed capability characteristics, started Update on *>i100.0.2.0/24 It is valid only when the router (or Layer 3 switch) disables the routing function ( no ip routing ); 8 Command 100 Ip prefix-list 1 permit 100.0.1.0/24 IP CEF turbo control turbo vector Ip flow-export forwards the NETFLOW audited packet to the specified device . Cisco Private Sticky MAC Addresses : 0 !!sticky 's secure address, there is no Last Source Address:Vlan : 00b0.1111.2222:10 !! The nearest secure address +vlan Security Violation Count : 0 !! The number of violations that have occurred in the history of this interface Therefore, we still need to keep the AS_PATH of its details on the summary route. As for the order of the AS number in the AS_PATH of the reserved detailed route , it is not important, because we only need the AS number for the purpose of anti-ring. It is. Therefore , the summary route generated by R3 actually carries two AS_PATH types, one is AS_Seq , the value is 300 , the other type is AS_set , contains two AS numbers of {100,200} , and is unordered. So the AS_PATH received on R4 is 300 (100,200} combined . It is worth noting that the AS number in this bracket is only counted as one hop when performing the AS_PATH calculation. For the verification of this point, please see the section on routing rules.