ccnp route drag and drop questions

ccnp route drag and drop questions

Therefore, AVG is responsible for distributing virtual MACs , and AVF is responsible for forwarding data. *>i 12 Network Switchport access vlan 10 interface fast0/24 Neighbor 3.3.3.3 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 3.3.3.3 next-hop-self ? Neighbor 10.1.23.3 remote-as 13 *> 100.0.1.0/24 Delete a specific community value in the community list C 1.1.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback0 2.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets Test purpose: trunk allowed vlan The configured static network path is redistributed into OSPF . In this way, when the intranet user needs to access the Netcom resources, because of the details of the network access, go to OR1 . To access other resources, take the default route to OR2 . Experiment 1 : Basic experiment Whenever a route is reflected by the reflector, the cluster -ID of the reflector (the cluster) is added to the route's Cluster-list attribute. Interface configuration: spanning-tree bpdufilter enable ? confidential Learning from other sources, the routing source is incomplete (confirm that the source of the routing information is incomplete). ( Republish IGP or static ) In a DHCP snooping environment (deployed on a switch), we consider ports as either trust or untrust ,ccnp route drag and drop questions, which is a trusted or untrusted interface. On the switch, configure the interface connected to the legal DHCP server as trust . Only received on the trust interface Write-delay Configure delay timer for writes to URL R3 and R4 , R4 and R5 establish IBGP neighbor relationships, and R3 R4 R5 uses LOOPBACK as the update source and refers to the neighbor . SW1#show int trunk C ? Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, multipath Switch(config-if)# no shutdown The metric is a value) Ip address 192.168.10.254 255.255.255.0 Must be zero What package? Switch(config-if)# switchport mode encapsulation {dot1q | ISL} When track1 is true , that is, 10.1.1.2 is reachable, the data of the PC accessing the 100 network is lost to 10.1.1.2 . If track 1 is hung, the next next-hop is switched. When the network is normal, the data is forced to go ISP1 , ping 100 remote network data to ISP1 DUAL AS provides a migration solution: Allow R2 's BGP process to take into account both AS numbers, 200 and 201 , of which 200 If you try to activate port-security on an 802.1X interface, you will get an error and the port-security feature will not open. Static route 20 Since the flash space is very limited, it is recommended to store the file on the TFTP server. When deploying on a TFTP server, be careful to first create an empty file to correspond to the URL in the configuration command . This file is used for dhcp snooping bingding database writes (depending on the device). 100 R3 and R4 establish IBGP neighbor relationship, and R3 on the OSPF routes redistributed into BGP NEXT_HOP on NMBA network Path Using route reflector 23 About IP Routing An escape character that is used to convert the control character immediately following it to a normal character First, let's get a glimpse of route-map . Looking at the figure above, we redistribute OSPF routes into RIP on R2 . As mentioned above, when re-publishing, you can use the metric keyword to set the metric after the route is re-advertised into RIP . Set to 1 here . The immediate result is that all OSPF routes injected into RIP have a metric of 1 . So what if I want to make some flexibility adjustments? For example, I hope that after the route is injected into RIP , the metric of the 192.168.1.0 route is 1 and the metric of 2.0 is 2 . Traditional redistribution is impossible.