ccnp switch final practical exam

ccnp switch final practical exam

Route-map cisco permit 20 match ip address 2 set metric 20 BGP , the IBGP neighbor relationship is established between the BEs . If A has a network segment 1.1.1.0 , A injected into the BGP , and transmitted to the EBGP neighbors B , Route summary 192.1.168.1 3 0003.47d8.c91f 2BB6488E interface-id 21ae5fbb Match x4 set Y If an OSPF in- process route cannot be summarized: Ip community-list 11 permit 100:11 route-map test permit 10 Address-family ipv4 unicast Network 100.0.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 Ip policy-list as100 permit match as-path 1 BGP router identifier 3.3.3.3, local AS number 345 BGP table version is 1, main routing table version 1 5.5.5.5 ( metric 2 ) from 5.5.5.5 (5.5.5.5) This environment is relatively simple, PC and DHCP server in the same VLAN , I mainly want to confirm that the ordinary switch pair is carried Local origin Y RouterID : 1.1.1.1 Ip address 192.168.20.254 255.255.255.0 1.0.0.0/8 route 1,10,20,30 ORIGINATOR_ID and CLUSTER_LIST The configuration of R1 is as follows: The above command means to inject the detail route defined in map1 in the local BGP RIB when the summary route matched by map2 is normal . When the summary route hangs, this detail disappears. This is called conditional injection . Below we look at the details of these two route-map , these need to pay special attention. Host address. On R2 , in order to reach the network connected by R1 , R2 configures a tool that uses route summarization, referring to a summary route: 192.168.0.0/16 to R1 , although this does serve the purpose of network optimization, but this summary route Too "rough", it even includes the network segment on the R3 side,ccnp switch final practical exam, we call this behavior not accurate enough. Therefore, an ideal way is to use a "just right" summary route that includes these detailed routes, so that you can avoid the problem of insufficient aggregation.