ccnp switch 300-115 labsim

ccnp switch 300-115 labsim

As we R3 on the RIP routes injected into OSPF marked the Tag 1111 , then the next None ? Looking at the above picture, we made a manual route summary on R3 . This summary route was generated by R3 and passed to R4 . At this time, the AS_PATH of this summary route is 300 , and the detailed route under it is lost. AS_PATH attribute, then if R4 and R1 or Another CASE that associates the static route of the outgoing interface : For example, to fetch the 192.168.1.0/24 route, access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 Ip address 10.1.34.3 255.255.255.0 aggregate-address 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 as-set after, R1 can only learn to 2.0 , the summary route are rejected, the reason is 1.0 carries no-adver of Community Community , when the summary route plus the as-set keyword after Will inherit its community , so the summary route also carries no-adver , this time 4.3.2 Message Type 35 In the same network topology, if there are two different routing protocols, because the mechanisms of different routing protocols are different,ccnp switch 300-115 labsim, the understanding of routing is different, which causes the isolation of routing information in the network. This is most likely a network within the same autonomous system. The entire network needs to be interoperable. What should I do? This requires the use of routing re-release.