ccna & ccnp r&s practice toolkit

ccna & ccnp r&s practice toolkit

Match the AS_PATH that does not contain any AS number , that is , the route in the AS . Ftp: Database agent URL First select root , the SW1 with the smallest MAC address of the switch wins and becomes root. The number of addresses. The switch assigns MAC addresses in order Complete basic configuration 2 Path A strange phenomenon has appeared. It seems that R4 does not reflect the route from R5 to R3 . Why? In theory, the RR will learn from non- client of IBGP neighbor to route reflection to their Client , but it is clear, in this experiment,ccna & ccnp r&s practice toolkit, R4 and did not learn from R5 route reflection to their Client . Ip community-list standard del permit no-export route-map test permit 10 SW2 realizes that there is a relay information option in the DHCP message, which is option82 , but giaddr is all 0s . Although SW2 realized this problem, he still gave this data to the DHCPserver through the debug information on the DHCPserver : Looking at the BGP table of R4 , we find that: Since the configuration of the first experiment Rl , therefore R2 Flights 13 segments, it is preferable that Rl , this time in R2 a clear click BGP neighbor Rl , and the Rl BGP connection DOWN , R2 Flights 13 routes and preferably the R3 , After R2 and R1 restore the BGP connection and receive the 13 route update of R1 again , R2 is still preferred to R3. UPDATE message After these subnet routes are passed to AS200 , R4 and R5 do route summarization, and the summary routes are passed to AS100 . At this time, if R1 wants to go to the 172.16.1.0 and 2.0 subnets, it may be to go to one side, either to R2 or R3 . This is of course not the optimal implementation. We hope to see R1 go to 1.0 subnet and go to R2. , go 2.0 subnets go R3 , then the idea is to achieve in R2 and R3 deployment BGP deaggregation , the R2 to AS100 injected Criteria breakdown 172.16.1.0/24 , R3 injection 172.16.2.